Okey, will do fix for validation first.
Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Evgeniy L <[email protected]> wrote: > Aleksey, here is working version [1]. > > >> Evgeniy, do we need to remove jinja before July 30th ? > > With this issue feature can leave, and it won't have huge user impact. > At the same time by design we didn't want to have anything except > substitution, hence it's probably as Sergey mentioned is a bug. > So looks like it can be fixed after 30th of July, and should not be > considered as a blocker. Validation is much more important, so lets > fix it first. > > [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/406104/ > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Evgeniy, do we need to remove jinja before July 30th ? >>> >> >> I think -- not. >> It just a bug, not a key-point of feature. >> >> >> /sv >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
