Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

[Morgan Fainberg]

> On Aug 2, 2015, at 16:00, Daniel Comnea <comnea.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation in 
> OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be selfish, take into 
> account the others :)
> 
> ZK is a robust technology but hey is a beast like Rabbit, there is a lot to 
> massage and over 2 data centers ZK is not very efficient.
> 

Sure, lets evaluate the more far reaching benefits of running the new service 
for all openstack deployments. This is not a "hey neat tech" debate, it is a 
"lets see if this tool solves enough issues that it is worth using an 
'innovation token' on". I think it is worth it personally, but it should be a 
consistent choice with a strong reason and added value beyond a single one-off 
usecase. 

--morgan

Sent via mobile
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev