We're in the process of converting existing meters to use a more declarative approach where we add the meter definition as part of a yaml. As part of this transition there are few notification handlers where the id is not consistent. For example, in profiler notification Handler the resource_id is set to "profiler-%s" % message["payload"]["base_id"] . Is there a reason we have the prefix? Can we ignore this and directly set to message["payload"]["base_id"] ? Seems like there is no real need for the prefix here unless i'm missing something. Can we go ahead and drop this?
If we don't hear anything i'll assume there is no objection to dropping this prefix. Thanks, -- -- Pradeep Kilambi; irc: prad OpenStack Engineering
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
