On 2015-08-31 16:23:14 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've released 0.10.0: > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sqlalchemy-migrate/0.10.0
With an intermediate 0.9.9 you could have avoided leaving things broken while requirements gets updated. Consider that a "revert" of tagging. > I have a patch up to g-r on stable/kilo to block 0.9.8 and cap at <0.10.0: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219027/ Would have been nice to get that merged first with a "revert" of the 0.9.8 tag (per above). > I don't think we need to revert that change. sqlalchemy-migrate doesn't > have a stable/kilo branch, but if/when we need one, I'd create it from the > 0.9.7 tag. Sure, and tag it... what? There's nothing higher than 0.9.7 which wouldn't require yet another change to the requirements cap in kilo (and subsequent propagation). > I also pushed a change to the infra-manual docs to remind me from being dumb > in the future: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219030/ Thanks, +2! -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
