On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Matt Riedemann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 9/4/2015 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> There are a few things blowing up in the last 24 hours so might as well >> make people aware. >> >> 1. gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops was failing at a decent rate: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1491949 >> >> Turns out devstack was changed to run multihost=true and that doesn't >> work so well with the large-ops job that's creating hundreds of fake >> instances on a single node. We reverted the devstack change so things >> should be good there now. >> >> >> 2. gate-tempest-dsvm-cells was regressed because nova has an in-tree >> blacklist regex of tests that don't work with cells and renaming some of >> those in tempest broke the regex. >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1492255 >> >> There is a patch in the gate but it's getting bounced on #3. Long-term >> we want to bring that blacklist regex down to 0 and instead use feature >> toggles in Tempest for the cells job, we just aren't there yet. Help >> wanted... >> >> >> 3. gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph is broken with glance-store 0.9.0: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1492432 >> >> It looks like the gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-src-glance_store job was >> not actually testing trunk glance_store code because of a problem in the >> upper-constraints.txt file in the requirements repo - pip was capping >> glance_store at 0.8.0 in the src job so we actually haven't been testing >> latest glance-store. dhellmann posted a fix: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220648/ >> >> But I'm assuming glance-store 0.9.0 is still busted. I've posted a >> change which I think might be related: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220646/ >> >> If ^ fixes the issue we'll need to blacklist 0.9.0 from >> global-requirements. >> >> -- >> >> As always, it's fun to hit this stuff right before the weekend, >> especially a long US holiday weekend. :) >> >> > I haven't seen the elastic-recheck bot comment on any changes in awhile > either so I'm wondering if that's not running. > Looks like there was a suspicious 4 day gap in elastic-recheck, but it appears to be running again? $ ./lastcomment.py Checking name: Elastic Recheck [0] 2015-09-06 01:12:40 (0:35:54 old) https://review.openstack.org/220386 'Reject the cell name include '!', '.' and '@' for Nova API' [1] 2015-09-02 00:54:54 (4 days, 0:53:40 old) https://review.openstack.org/218781 'Remove the unnecassary volume_api.get(context, volume_id)' > > Also, here is another new(ish) gate bug I'm just seeing tonight (bumped a > fix for #3 above): > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystonemiddleware/+bug/1492508 > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
