Hi. Sorry for bringing this thread back from the grave but it look quite interesting to me.
Sheena, could you please explain how pre-deployment sanity checks should look like? I don't get what it is. >From the Health Check point of view plugins may be divided to two groups: 1) A plugin that doesn't change an already covered functionality thus doesn't require extra tests implemented. Such plugins may be Contrail and almost all SDN plugins, Glance or Cinder backend plugins, and others which don't bring any changes in OSt API or any extra OSt components. 2) A plugin that adds new elements into OSt or changes API or a standard behavior. Such plugins may be Contrail (because it actually adds Contrail Controller which may be covered by Health Check too), Cisco ASR plugin (because it always creates HA routers), some Swift plugins (we don't have Swift/S3 API covered by Health Check now at all), SR-IOV plugins (because they require special network preparation and extra drivers to be presented in an image), when a combination of different ML2 plugins or hypervisors deployed (because you need to test all network underlayers or HVs). So, all that means we need to make OSTF extendible by Fuel plugin's tests eventually. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sheena Gregson <[email protected]> wrote: > I like that idea a lot – I also think there would be value in adding > pre-deployment sanity checks that could be called from the Health Check > screen prior to deployment. Thoughts? > > > > *From:* Simon Pasquier [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2015 9:00 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] add health check for > plugins > > > > Hello Samuel, > > This looks like an interesting idea. Do you have any concrete example to > illustrate your point (with one of your plugins maybe)? > > BR, > > Simon > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Samuel Bartel < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > actually with fuel plugins there are test for the plugins used by the > CICD, but after a deployment it is not possible for the user to easily test > if a plugin is crrectly deploy or not. > > I am wondering if it could be interesting to improve the fuel plugin > framework in order to be able to define test for each plugin which would ba > dded to the health Check. the user would be able to test the plugin when > testing the deployment test. > > > > What do you think about that? > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > Samuel > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Andrey Danin [email protected] skype: gcon.monolake
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
