Hi There, I just added my comment on the review. I do agree with Emilien. There should be specific repos for plugins and drivers.
BTW. I love the sdnmagic name ;-) Edgar On 9/25/15, 9:02 AM, "Emilien Macchi" <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >In our last meeting [1], we were discussing about whether managing or >not external packaging repositories for Neutron plugin dependencies. > >Current situation: >puppet-neutron is installing (packages like neutron-plugin-*) & >configure Neutron plugins (configuration files like >/etc/neutron/plugins/*.ini >Some plugins (Cisco) are doing more: they install third party packages >(not part of OpenStack), from external repos. > >The question is: should we continue that way and accept that kind of >patch [2]? > >I vote for no: managing external packages & external repositories should >be up to an external more. >Example: my SDN tool is called "sdnmagic": >1/ patch puppet-neutron to manage neutron-plugin-sdnmagic package and >configure the .ini file(s) to make it work in Neutron >2/ create puppet-sdnmagic that will take care of everything else: >install sdnmagic, manage packaging (and specific dependencies), >repositories, etc. >I -1 puppet-neutron should handle it. We are not managing SDN soltution: >we are enabling puppet-neutron to work with them. > >I would like to find a consensus here, that will be consistent across >*all plugins* without exception. > > >Thanks for your feedback, > >[1] http://goo.gl/zehmN2 >[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209997/ >-- >Emilien Macchi > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
