On 01/10/15 17:17, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi PTLs, > > A few weeks ago I posted here the allocation of slots for each track at > the Design Summit: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073654.html > > You replied with a set of constraints, which makes it a fun scheduling > problem to solve. I did my best to take those constraints into account, > as well as avoiding to book a slot when the project PTL is giving a talk > at the conference. Here is the resulting proposed room/time layout result: > > http://tinyurl.com/mitaka-design-summit > > Feel free to reach out to me if you spot any glaring issue with the > proposed schedule. I don't promise I'll fix it to your satisfaction, > because the equilibrium is pretty fragile here. > > I'll push this proposed layout to Cheddar early next week (probably on > Monday) so you can start scheduling, so please comment before then. The > site is not up yet, but I already pushed instructions on how to do the > scheduling at: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/SchedulingForPTLs > > Eagle eyes will have noticed that there are two empty slots (highlighted > in red in the page). Those are up for grabs, if you're interested let me > know (there may be a few more available if any project team decides they > don't need that much space after all). If there are a lot of requests > for those, I plan to give priority to the late-comers in the tent which > don't have any space yet. > > See you all in 3.5 weeks in Tokyo! >
In previous years we have had "related open source project" sessions at the design summit, is that happening this year, or is space at too much of a premium? __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
