On 07/10/15 11:12 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:

I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around patches
that really matter.

I think that's where you are making a mistake. They are contributors,
like me or Victor, are knocking on the Glance doors for months now,
sending patches that resolve technical debt rather than adding new
debt^Wfeatures. Currently, these patches are not seen as important and
are often "dismissed". So I'm pretty sure they are going to expire with
this new system.

I can't do anything for the past failures other than saying I'm sorry.
As I mentioned in previous emails in this thread, the work to make the
review process better is unrelated to the topic on this email, really.

I wouldn't say that your patches (or Victor's) weren't important for
the team but I would like to avoid getting into the details of the
past, tbh.

Imagine that if you were merging patches from me, Victor, and people
like us, we would continue to send many of them, and mid-term, you'd get
some new blood on your core team.

I don't think this needs to be explained and I trust the whole Glance
core team to know this. Although, it's better to be explicit than
implicit so, thanks.


What is proposed here is really focusing on making life easier for the
current core team which is in large majority inactive.

This is were I think I'm failing to communicate the intention here.
The dashboard[0] I've put up is the one that intends to make the core
team's life easier.

[0] http://bit.ly/glance-review-dashboard


Don't read me wrong. I know you and Nikhil are both well-intentioned by
proposing that. I just think it's going to be worse, because it won't
improve much and you're going to push new contributors away.

Absolutely, I value everyone's feedback on this thread a lot. I hope
I'm explaining the goal correctly. If I'm not, I'm more than happy to
talk more about this (See my email with some stats for example).

Cheers,
Flavio


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to