On 7 October 2015 at 07:50, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote:

> > On 06 Oct 2015, at 19:26, ZZelle <zze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> >
> > As decided during last neutron meeting[1], we try to let Launchpad
> expire outdated bugs.
> >
> > The status of every bug without activity in last year has been set to
> Incomplete and their assignee/milestone unset in order to let Launchpad
> expire them in 60 days[2].
> >
> > It gives us a 60-days window to "revive" expirable bugs[3] which are
> (sadly :)) still valid (by changing their status).
> >
>
> I went thru the whole list of expirable bugs and moved some of them back
> to Confirmed where it seems to apply, plus added tags. I believe now we
> should not loose anything valuable.
>

Thanks Ihar, much appreciated. I'll have another pass too.

>
> Ihar
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to