On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:57:59PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > We're starting to make plans for the next cycle. Long term plans are > > getting made for details that would happen in one or two cycles. > > > > As we already have the locations for the N and O summits I think we > > should do the naming polls now and have names we can use for this > > planning instead of letters. It's pretty minor but it doesn't seem like > > there is any real reason to wait and have everyone come up with working > > names that turn out to be confusing later. > > That sounds fair. However the release naming process currently states[1]: > > """ > The process to chose the name for a release begins once the location of > the design summit of the release to be named is announced and no sooner > than the opening of development of the previous release. > """ > > ...which if I read it correctly means we could pick N now, but not O. We > might want to change that (again) first.
Since changing the naming process may take non-negligible time, could we parallelize, so we can at least press ahead with picking a name for N asap which is permitted by current rules. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev