On 10/15/2015 07:35 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-10-15 00:31:44 +0200: > I wasn't clear. The reason cliff-tablib exists is because of earlier > complaints (maybe from you?) about tablib. I didn't have time to > rewrite the formatters, so I pulled them into their own package so > it wasn't necessary to ship them. Now that we have the useful ones > included in cliff directly in a way that doesn't use tablib, you > should not need either cliff-tablib or tablib. We may need patches > to upstream packages that still have the cliff-tablib dependency. > Nothing should be using tablib directly, AFAIK. > > Doug
Thanks for clearing this up. I'll see if I can get rid of tablib in packages and if it still continues to work. Though I may work on this a bit later: I've currently started the huge task of uploading 102 Liberty (and related) packages to move them from Debian Experimental to Sid, and after that, I'll have a 5 days break, then the Tokyo summit... But after that, removing tablib from the equation will allow me to bring even more Python 3 support in packages, which is great. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
