On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 11:19 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:10:16PM +0000, Dulko, Michal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > One of our priority goals for Liberty was the adoption of > > oslo.versionedobjects in order for Cinder to achieve ability to do > > rolling upgrades. We weren't successful with that in L, and work got > > postponed to Mitaka. I want to highlight remaining work in that topic as > > well as other pieces that are still missing in order for Cinder to > > support no-downtime-upgrades. > > > <snip> > > > > Changing this is required for us to be able to remove or rename fields > > in these dictionaries and still be able to provide interoperability of > > services working in different versions. > > > > I would love to get some feedback on these thoughts and possibly start a > > pre-summit discussion on the whole topic. > > Thanks for bringing this up Michal. Will you be around for the weekly > meeting this week? It would be great if we could get this on the agenda > just to make sure everyone is aware of it. > > That may help to make sure more folks have had a chance to think about > this, even briefly, before the design summit. > > Thanks! > Sean
I've added an item to the agenda. This is a big topic, but I'll try to prepare some general questions to shape the discussion a little. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
