Ihar, Mark thank you for your comments! Change [1] is ready, so we can land it in Neutron. For subprojects it will be up to them to have HEAD files or not - tests won't fail, just warning message will be shown.
[1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232607 On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Mark McClain <m...@mcclain.xyz> wrote: > > There are pros and cons for both approaches, but overall, I don’t see how > the former justify having HEAD files and the complexity to handle them in > code and in file system. > > > The HEAD file is a clear winner when gate load is high and there are > competing migrations. As you pointed out PEP8 will detect the problem, but > not fast enough to cause a ripple in the changes behind it in the gate. > The ripple causes resources to be wasted adding to the load, so the git > merge conflict was the best compromise we developed. > > mark > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Regards, Ann Kamyshnikova Mirantis, Inc
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
