+1 :)

Jeff Peeler schreef op 2015-11-13 19:51:
On 12/11/15 08:41, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:

Hey folks,

Its been awhile since we have had a core reviewer nomination, but I
really feel like Michal has the right stuff. If you look at the 30 day
stats for kolla[1] , he is #3 in reviews (70 reviews) with 6 commits in
a 30 day period. He is beating 2/3rds of our core reviewer team on all
stats. I think his reviews, while could use a little more depth, are
solid and well considered. That said he participates on the mailing
list more then others and has been very active in IRC. He has come up
to speed on the code base in quick order and I expect if he keeps pace, the top reviewers in Kolla will be challenged to maintain their spots :)
Consider this proposal as a +1 vote from me.

As a reminder, our core review process requires 3 core reviewer +1
votes, with no core reviewer –1 (veto) votes within a 1 week period. If
your on the fence, best to abstain :) I'll close voting November 20th,
or sooner if there I a veto vote or a unanimous vote.

Regards
-steve

http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/30

+1!

_______________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to