Hi folks, Sorry I missed the letter. I'll take a look on this. As I understand, it's enough just to run functional tests to see the issue, right?
Nadya On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:48 PM, gord chung <[email protected]> wrote: > let's change this gate to experimental for now. > > On 17/11/15 05:10 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > Hi, > > So we recently decided to run the functional tests for the HBase driver > and enabled the gate job. It turned out the gate job didn't worked, so I > tried to fix it. Now it's almost fixed, and it run the functional tests > and Gabbi tests against Aodh with HBase as a back-end: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245585/ > > Obviously, as you know this is not a real HBase back-end, but a > in-memory backend that is provided inside Aodh. Now, it turns out that > this driver or this in-memory backend has a bug, as the Gabbi tests > fail. > > I don't have time nor interest to fix that, so the way I see it it's > either: > 1. Someone stands up, determines if the issue is in the driver or the > in-memory implementation and fix it > 2. Nobody cares and we drop HBase gate and deprecates the driver > > If nobody stands up in the next week, I'll start working on 2. > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > -- > gord > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
