Excerpts from David Chadwick's message of 2015-11-23 13:20:56 -0800: > Since the ultimate arbiter is the PTL, then it would be wrong to allow > members of the same organisation as the PTL to perform all three code > functions without the input of anyone from any other organisation. This > places too much power in the hands of one organisation to the detriment > of the overall community. >
This is just a vote for distrusting the community. If you think there's "power" in being able to merge things, and that organizations will abuse this power, then you vote for distrust. However, I don't think PTLs have power to censure anybody nor do they have absolute arbitration powers. They break ties. Whatever discretion they have can almost certainly be overridden by the TC according to this: "... if a given debate cannot be clearly resolved, the PTL can decide the outcome. Although the TC is generally not involved in team-internal decisions, it still has oversight over team decisions, especially when they affect other teams or go contrary to general OpenStack goals." http://governance.openstack.org/reference/charter.html#project-team-leads So I think if a PTL were to act improperly in a way that the project team disagreed with, it would be well within the right and charter of the TC to intervene as part of oversight. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev