+1, It's always very confusing the first time.
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
Confusion
=========
So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an
#openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people are
confused. How would people feel about creating #openstack-meeting-2 and making
it redirect to #openstack-meeting-alt?
I'd rather standardize and rename -alt to -2 (i.e. redirect -alt to -2
on IRC, and bulk-change all meetings YAML from -alt to -2).
I wanted to go the other way as it's slightly less impactful. Most people grok
that '-alt' == '-2'. if we redirect from 2 -> alt it's only a few people
that transparently get redirected.
If we do it the other way around everyone already in -alt needs to move.
I think it's a one-time cost to solve the confusion over the long run,
rather than keep the -alt non-standard construct forever. People have to
join new meeting channels regularly, it's not as if you'd "lose" people
in the process.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
