On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci > jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these > are the two projects where we find our ci provides the most value. But we > can only do this if the results from the job are treated as voting. > What does this mean? That the tripleo job could vote and do a -1 and block ironic's gate? > > In the past most of the non tripleo projects tended to ignore the > results from the tripleo job as it wasn't unusual for the job to broken for > days at a time. The thing is, ignoring the results of the job is the reason > (the majority of the time) it was broken in the first place. > To decrease the number of breakages we are now no longer running > master code for everything (for the non tripleo projects we bump the > versions we use periodically if they are working). I believe with this > model the CI jobs we run have become a lot more reliable, there are still > breakages but far less frequently. > > What I proposing is we add at least one of our tripleo jobs back to both > heat and ironic (and other projects associated with them e.g. clients, > ironicinspector etc..), tripleo will switch to running latest master of > those repositories and the cores approving on those projects should wait > for a passing CI jobs before hitting approve. So how do people feel about > doing this? can we give it a go? A couple of people have already expressed > an interest in doing this but I'd like to make sure were all in agreement > before switching it on. > > This seems to indicate that the tripleo jobs are non-voting, or at least won't block the gate -- so I'm fine with adding tripleo jobs to ironic. But if you want cores to wait/make sure they pass, then shouldn't they be voting? (Guess I'm a bit confused.) --ruby
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev