On 07/12/15 17:42, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:18:29PM EST, Carl Baldwin wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Henry Gessau <ges...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 1. RFE: "I want X" >>> 2. Spec: "I plan to implement X like this" >>> 3. devref: "How X is implemented and how to extend it" >>> 4. OS docs: "API and guide for using X" >>> >>> Once X is implemented I don't want to have to go to 1 or 2 to find >>> information >>> on it. The devref may have a lot of content from the spec, but the spec is >>> not >>> maintained and the implementation may differ in some ways. The devref should >>> be kept current with refactorings, etc. of the implementation. >> Henry, I was also impressed by how clearly you communicated this. >> This ought to be included somewhere prominently in our >> doc/source/policies/ or somewhere like that. >> > +10000 for Henry's great answer, and +10000 for Carl's suggestion! >
I've suggested a change for this at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254669/. Please take a look. Neil __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
