On 16/12/15 18:51 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
For what is is worth, we originally proposed oslo.policy to graduate to
Keystone when we were converting to the library. I still think it belongs in
keystone (as long as the oslo team doesn't mind that long-term keystone team
owns something in the oslo.XXXX namespace).

The short term adding keystone-core should get some more eyes on the reviews,
so +1 to that.


Just want to +1 all the above.

It'd be great if we can finally hand the library over to the keystone
team, where I think it belongs.

Cheers,
Flavio


--Morgan

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:

   As an interim measure, added keystone-core to oslo-policy-core[1]

   Thanks,
   Dims

   [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/556,members

   On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Dolph Mathews <dolph.math...@gmail.com>
   wrote:
   >
   > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
   wrote:
   >>
   >> Brant,
   >>
   >> I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core
   >> directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now).
   >
   >
   > That's certainly reasonable, and kind of what we did with pycadf.
   >
   >>
   >>
   >> The name is very possibly going to create confusion
   >
   >
   > I assume you're not referring to unnecessarily changing the name of the
   > project itself (oslo.policy) just because there might be a shift in the
   > group of maintainers! Either way, let's definitely not do that.
   >
   >>
   >> -- Dims
   >>
   >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jordan Pittier
   >> <jordan.pitt...@scality.com> wrote:
   >> > Hi,
   >> > I am sure oslo.policy would be good under Keystone's governance. But I
   >> > am
   >> > not sure I understood what's wrong in having oslo.policy under the
   oslo
   >> > program ?
   >> >
   >> > Jordan
   >> >
   >> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Brant Knudson <b...@acm.org> wrote:
   >> >>
   >> >>
   >> >> I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo program to the
   >> >> keystone program. Keystone developers know what's going on with
   >> >> oslo.policy
   >> >> and I think are more interested in what's going on with it so that
   >> >> reviews
   >> >> will get proper vetting, and it's not like oslo doesn't have enough
   >> >> going on
   >> >> with all the other repos. Keystone core has equivalent stringent
   >> >> development
   >> >> policy that we already enforce with keystoneclient and keystoneauth,
   so
   >> >> oslo.policy isn't going to be losing any stability.
   >> >>
   >> >> If there aren't any objections, let's go ahead with this. I heard
   this
   >> >> requires a change to a governance repo, and gerrit permission changes
   >> >> to
   >> >> make keystone-core core, and updates in oslo.policy to change some
   docs
   >> >> or
   >> >> links. Any oslo.policy specs that are currently proposed
   >> >>
   >> >> - Brant
   >> >>
   >> >>
   >> >>
   >> >>
   __________________________________________________________________________
   >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   >> >> Unsubscribe:
   >> >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
   >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
   >> >>
   >> >
   >> >
   >> >
   >> >
   __________________________________________________________________________
   >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   >> > Unsubscribe:
   >> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
   >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
   >> >
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> --
   >> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
   >>
   >>
   __________________________________________________________________________
   >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?
   subject:unsubscribe
   >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
   >
   >
   >
   >
   __________________________________________________________________________
   > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?
   subject:unsubscribe
   > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
   >



   --
   Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

   __________________________________________________________________________
   OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
   http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to