On 5 January 2016 at 12:01, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On 5 January 2016 at 11:59, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
>> This is odd indeed. pbr is not meant to have a dep on testrepository,
>> and you can see in
>> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/pbr/tree/pbr/testr_command.py#n150
>> that we only access it if it is installed.... and we use latest pbr
>> everywhere because otherwise we can't deal with ecosystem changes to
>> e.g. setuptools or pip.
>>
>> http://logs.openstack.org/96/262296/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full/e47e5c6/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-12-30_09_53_14_200
>> shows that the latest pbr (1.8.1 which would work) is being
>> downgraded. Thats when the problem is introduced. However, kilo has
>> that special thing where pbr is capped because a lot of dependencies
>> error due to version disagreements (not API breaks - pbr is
>> compatible!), so this is expected :(.
>>
>> I'm not sure what has caused testrepository to not be installed in
>> this scenario, but thats what I'd be looking at.
>>
>
> Further to that, I suspect setuptools may have changed -
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools - 19.2 was released
> suspiciously close to the point errors were reported (25th dec).
>
> Looking now..

Indeed - 
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/commits/fb35fcade302fa828d34e6aff952ec2398f2c877?at=get_command_list
- the failing bit AFAICT is indeed new code :/.

-Rob


-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hpe.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to