> On 6 Jan 2016, at 1:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > > On 2016-01-06 11:43:34 +1100 (+1100), Lana Brindley wrote: > [...] >> I’m starting to think that DocImpact needs to simply be retired then > > Alternatively, let the remaining projects which currently auto-open > bugs for openstack-manuals switch to opening bugs against themselves > and allow their bug triagers to redirect them to the docs team once > the requisite details are determined. And then if those projects > don't want to do the work of enforcing or researching the reasons > for docimpact headers in individual changes, they can decide to stop > supporting them on a project-by-project basis.
Well, we’ve already done that for big tent projects. The new job was the solution for the ‘defcore’ projects, which we were guinea-pigging in Nova before rolling it out to the others. But if Nova rejects it, I think that maybe we’re dead in the water. L Lana Brindley writer:speaker:blogger http://lanabrindley.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
