Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/

Best regards,
Hongbin

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] 
Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from 
gate

Hongbin,

I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are 
there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach.

Adrian

> On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Clark,
> 
> That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate 
> pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass 
> the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the 
> test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the 
> patches that already passed the check.
> 
> An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or 
> mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust 
> the review accordingly.
> 
> Best regards,
> Honbgin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org]
> Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func 
> test from gate
> 
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively 
>> impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from 
>> Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable.
>> Please find the details in the review
>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you 
>> have any concern.
>> 
> Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much 
> because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from 
> Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass.
> 
> Clark
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to