Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Agreed with Gary on behalf of my European compatriots. (Note that I
*personally* +1’d the patch because I don’t mind, doing late hours anyway;
but it’s sad it was ninja merged without giving any chance for those from
affected timezones to express their concerns).

So Ninja merged has a negative connotation that I refute.


Oh does it? I thought it’s merely about the speed. :-X Sorry for misunderstanding, I have not implied any guilt on your behalf. If anything, it’s me who put +1 while having concerns that should be blamed.

I merged it.  It was judgment error, and I apologise for that.

 * I found and read through the list thread.
 * Saw only +1's yours included
    - known you'd be affected I used your +1 as a barometer

My mistake was not noticing your request to leave the review open for longer.

I also noted in my review that reverting it is pretty low cost to back it out
if needed.

I understand that the 'root cause' for this change was the yaml2ical issue that
stemmed from having 2 odd week in a row.  We've fixed that [1]. I'm also
working a a more human concept of biweekly meeting in yaml2ical.

Tony
[1] the next time it could have been a problem is 2020/2021 ;P
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to