Thanks for the links Jeremy! I'm still reading through what exactly "bigtent" means, not sure I grok the placement for littler/ancillary things like this effort, but the the links are hugely helpful!
- joe _____________________________ From: Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Shovel (RackHD/OpenStack) To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 2016-01-15 18:44:42 +0000 (+0000), Heck, Joseph wrote: [...] > I haven’t been following the community and the norms closely for a couple > years - Stackforge appears to have dissipated in favor of projects in > incubation to share things like this. Is that accurate? The idea of "incubating" before becoming an official project basically went away with the advent of the "Big Tent"[1]. Also the _term_ "StackForge" isn't dead (yet[2] anyway), but we have unofficial^WStackForge repos just share the same Git repository namespace[3] with official ones now for ease of management and to reduce the amount of disruptive renaming we used to have to accommodate moving between namespaces. [1] http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.html [2] https://review.openstack.org/265352 [3] http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20150615-stackforge-retirement.html -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
