If member port (IP address) is allocated by neutron, then why do we need to specify it explicitly? It can be derived by LBaaS driver implicitly.
Thanks, Vivek On 1/17/16, 1:05 AM, "Samuel Bercovici" <samu...@radware.com> wrote: >Btw. > >I am still in favor on associating the subnets to the LB and then not specify >them per node at all. > >-Sam. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] >Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:14 AM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Should subnet be >optional on member create? > >+1 >Subnet should be mandatory > >The only thing this makes supporting load balancing servers which are not >running in the cloud more challenging to support. >But I do not see this as a huge user story (lb in cloud load balancing IPs >outside the cloud) > >-Sam. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com] >Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 6:56 AM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Should subnet be optional >on member create? > >I filed a bug [1] a while ago that subnet_id should be an optional parameter >for member creation. Currently it is required. Review [2] is makes it >optional. > >The original thinking was that if the load balancer is ever connected to that >same subnet, be it by another member on that subnet or the vip on that subnet, >then the user does not need to specify the subnet for new member if that new >member is on one of those subnets. > >At the midcycle we discussed it and we had an informal agreement that it >required too many assumptions on the part of the end user, neutron lbaas, and >driver. > >If anyone wants to voice their opinion on this matter, do so on the bug >report, review, or in response to this thread. Otherwise, it'll probably be >abandoned and not done at some point. > >Thanks, >Brandon > >[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1426248 >[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267935/ >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
