Hello, Premysl, I'm not working on these features, however I am working in this area of code implementing the libvirt storage pools spec. If anybody does start working on this, please reach out to coordinate as I have a bunch of related patches. My work should also make your features significantly easier to implement.
Out of curiosity, can you explain why you want to use LVM specifically over the file-based backends? Matt On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Premysl Kouril <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > we are a Europe based operator and we have a case for LVM based nova > instances in our new cloud infrastructure. We are currently > considering to contribute to OpenStack Nova to implement some features > which are currently not supported for LVM based instances (they are > only supported for raw/qcow2 file based instances). As an example of > such features - nova block live migration or thin provisioning - these > nowadays don't work with LVM based instances (they do work for file > based). > > Before actually diving into development here internally - we wanted to > check on possibility to actually sponsor this development within > existing community. So if there is someone who would be interested in > this work please drop me an email. > > Regards, > Prema > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Matthew Booth Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team Phone: +442070094448 (UK)
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
