On 22 December 2015 at 11:38, Dougal Matthews <dou...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. > As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into > Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming > more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already). > > TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar > attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2] > > Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar, > python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it > from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements. > > I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January > if there are no objections. > It seems about time to kick this off! So, for anyone that was following this thread. I have started the process for removing the Tuskar repos with this review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270850/ Followed by these three dependent reviews: - https://review.openstack.org/270855 - https://review.openstack.org/270854 - https://review.openstack.org/270851 Then finally, dependent on all of the above: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270869/ > Cheers, > Dougal > > > [1]: > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432 >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
