On 01/27/2016 06:20 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> In which way what you're proposing above is different from what we >> currently have (ie: beta 1, 2 and 3)? > > we'd be communicating more strenuously to consumers that this was > really meant to be a release that would be a very very very smooth > upgrade experience as it really focuses on stability.
That's IMO a very dangerous thing to do. These wouldn't be stable releases without security support. Unless there's 3 times the staffing in the stable release team, let's not do that. Though I very much welcome anyone to give feedback on the beta releases (I'm very close from announcing Mitaka b2 for Debian & Ubuntu btw). We've been discussing release cadence over and over again. Some want it quicker (mostly devs), some want it slower (mostly: ops) and always, the consensus was that what we have right now is a good compromise. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
