+1 Sounds good to separate those to different repo.
Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Matthew Treinish <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Koderer, Marc wrote: >> I know that there are folks around that are using it. >> +1 to move it to a separate repo. > > That sounds fine to me, let's mark the stress runner as deprecated and before > we remove it someone can spin up a separate repo that owns the stress runner > moving forward. But, I don't think we should hold up marking the deprecation > until that exists. Let's move forward on the deprecation to give users enough > time to prepare that the in-tree version is going away. > > -Matt Treinish > >> >> Regards >> Marc >> >> > On 11 Feb 2016, at 13:59, Daniel Mellado <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > +1 to that, it was my 2nd to-be-deprecated after javelin ;) >> > >> > El 11/02/16 a las 12:47, Sean Dague escribió: >> >> In order to keep Tempest healthy I feel like it's time to prune things >> >> that are outside of the core mission, especially when there are other >> >> options out there. >> >> >> >> The stress test framework in tempest is one of those. It builds on other >> >> things in Tempest, but isn't core to it. >> >> >> >> I'd propose that becomes deprecated now, and removed in Newton. If there >> >> are folks that would like to carry it on from there, I think we should >> >> spin it into a dedicated repository and just have it require tempest. >> >> >> >> -Sean >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
