So for thin containers, as opposed to data containers, there is no migration script needed whatsoever. All it takes is to tear down neutron-agents and start thin containers.
On 21 February 2016 at 06:47, Jeffrey Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the thin container idea, and I am +1 too. But the only concern is > that we MUST provide a robust migrate script( or Ansible role task) to do > the convert stuff. Doesn't we have enough time for this? > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Michal Rostecki <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On 02/20/2016 05:39 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> >>> Sam, >>> >>> I seem to recall Paul was not in favor, so there was not a majority of >>> cores there. There were 6 core reviewers at the midcycle, and if you >>> only count kolla-core (which at this time I do for policy changes) that >>> means we had a vote of 5. We have 11 core reviewers, so we need a vote >>> of 6+ for simple majority. I was also sort of –1 because it is an >>> exception, but I do agree the value is warranted. I believe I expressed >>> at the midcycle that I was –1 to the idea, atleast until the broader >>> core review team voted. If I wasn't clear on that, I apologize. >>> >>> I'll roll with the community on this one unless I have to tie break – >>> then groan :) >>> >>> That is why a decision was made by the group to take this to the mailing >>> list. >>> >>> Regards >>> -steve >>> >>> From: Sam Yaple <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Reply-To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for >>> usage questions)" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM >>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers >>> to stable/liberty >>> >>> I was under the impression we did have a majority of cores in favor >>> of the idea at the midcycle. But if this is a vote-vote, then I am a >>> very strong +1 as well. This is something operators will absolutely >>> want and and need. >>> >>> Sam Yaple >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michał Jastrzębski >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Strong +1 from me. This have multiple benefits: >>> Easier (aka possible) debugging of networking in running envs >>> (not >>> having tools like tcpdump at your disposal is a pain) - granted, >>> there >>> are ways to get this working without thin containers but require >>> fair >>> amount of docker knowledge. >>> Docker daemon restart will not break routers - currently with >>> docker >>> restart container with namespace dies and we lose our routers >>> (they >>> will migrate using HA, but well, still a networking downtime). >>> This >>> will no longer be the case so... >>> Upgrades with no vm downtime whatsoever depends on this one. >>> If we could deploy liberty code with all these nice stuff, I'd be >>> happier person;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Michal >>> >>> On 20 February 2016 at 07:40, Steven Dake (stdake) >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > Just clarifying, this is not a "revote" - there were not enough >>> core >>> > reviewers in favor of this idea at the Kolla midcycle, so we >>> need to have a >>> > vote on the mailing list to sort out this policy decision of >>> managing >>> > stable/liberty. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > -steve >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Steven Dake <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >>> questions)" >>> > <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM >>> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >>> questions)" >>> > <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin >>> containers to >>> > stable/liberty >>> > >>> > Folks, >>> > >>> > There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority >>> approval of the >>> > neutron thin container backport idea, so we separated it out >>> from fixing >>> > stable/liberty itself. >>> > >>> > I am going to keep voting open for *2* weeks this time. The >>> reason for the >>> > two weeks is I would like a week of discussion before people >>> just blindly >>> > vote ;) >>> > >>> > Voting begins now and concludes March 4th. Since this is a >>> policy decision, >>> > no veto votes are permitted, just a +1 and a -1. Abstaining >>> is the same as >>> > voting –1. >>> > >> >> >> I'm +1, but under condition that we will provide some script to migrate >> from supervisord-container to thin-containers (even if such a script will >> bring risk of downtime of the cloud). >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > -- > Jeffrey Zhang > Blog: http://xcodest.me > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
