On 02/21/2016 12:50 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
In a recent api-wg meeting I set forth the idea that it is both a
bad idea to add lots of different headers and to add headers which
have meaning in the name of the header (rather than just the value).
This proved to a bit confusing, so I was asked to write it up. I
did:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280381/
When I did, the best example for how _not_ to do things is the way in
which we are currently doing microversion headers.
So two questions:
* Is my position on header non proliferation right?
Yes, I believe so.
* Is it so right that we should consider doing microversions
differently?
Ship has sailed on a number of things, including this. I *do* think it
would be great to just use OpenStack-API-Version: $SERVICE_TYPE X.Y,
however we'll need to add another microversion to support that of
course. Isn't it ironic? Don't you think?
-jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
