On 22 February 2016 at 06:40, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote:
> > I'd vote for the extra round trip and implementation of caching whenever > possible. Using another endpoint is really annoying, I already have > specific stuff for cinder to setup both v1 and v2 endpoint, as v2 > doesn't fully implements what's in v1. BTW, where are we with this? Can > I fully get rid of the v1 endpoint, or will I still experience some > Tempest failures? > Can you detail what isn't in V2 that is in V1 please? I'm not aware of anything, and I'd consider anything missing to be a serious bug -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
