Hi, FFE not approved.
tl;dr Spec for this feature isn't yet approved, so, I couldn't grant FFE for it, because it'll take much more time to get spec aligned and then code with it and merged code finally. Regarding the support in all plugins - I more or less agree with Vitaly that we it's bad to have support for the Data Sources only in a single plugin, we can start with it in the beginning of cycle, but I prefer to not go with a new limited to concrete plugin version feature in release. Thanks. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Chen, Weiting <weiting.c...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Currently, there is no plan for other plugin support in this feature. > > We would like to put this feature on the table at first and see if it can > bring more customers who are interested in Big Data on Cloud and expecting > to integrate Hadoop with different storage type support. > > However, it’s just a beginning and should be worth a shot to bring it in > Mitaka. And to support any other plugin is also still open and on-demand in > the future. > > > > *From:* Vitaly Gridnev [mailto:vgrid...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:31 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara]FFE Request for > nfs-as-a-data-source > > > > Hi, > > > > From my point of view, if we adding new type of the datasources (or > configurations for that), it means that it should be supported in almost > all plugins (at least in vanilla, spark, ambari, cdh I guess). Current > implementation is nice, but it looks like it touches only vanilla 2.7.1 > plugin which strange for me. Are there plans to add support for other > plugins? If yes, then I think this feature should be done in Newton cycle > to have complete picture of this support. If no, I think it's ok to land > this code in RC with other improvements in validation. > > > > At conclusion I would like to say that from point of view we should > collaborate actively to implement this support in early Newton-1 cycle, > that would be a best choice. > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Chen, Weiting <weiting.c...@intel.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to request a FFE for the feature “nfs-as-a-data-source”: > > BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/nfs-as-a-data-source > > BP Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210839/ > > Sahara Code: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218638/ > > Sahara Image Elements Code: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218637/ > > > > Estimate Complete Time: The BP has been complete and the implementation > has been complete as well. All the code is under code reviewing and since > there is no big change or modify for the code we expect it can only take > one weeks to be merged. > > The Benefits for this change: Provide NFS support in Sahara. > > The Risk: The risk would be low for this patch, since all the functions > have been delivered. > > > > Thanks, > > Weiting(William) Chen > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Vitaly Gridnev > > Mirantis, Inc > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Principal Software Engineer Mirantis Inc.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
