Hi, Lucas, Thank you for your correspondence.
> I think we meant UEFI >= 2.4 there. That make sence! > Apparently in the UEFI version 2.4 some feature was introduced that is > required for the boot from volume > case. > Which function of UEFI 2.4 do you point to? It would be very helpful if you could point me which part of specifications[1] it is. Is it 10.11/10.12 or(and) others of the specifications[1]? [1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_2.4.pdf Best regards Daisuke Fujita > -----Original Message----- > From: Lucas Alvares Gomes [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:59 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 3/6 > > Hi Daisuke, > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Fujita, Daisuke > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Jim, Julia, and Ironicers, > > > > I have some questions about the BFV. > > > >> > * Hardware supports the UEFI 2.4 spec > > > > Could you please explain the reason that chose version not 2.5/2.6/2.3.1 > > but 2.4? > > In the etherpad[1], I was not able to read the reason why ironicers chose > > version 2.4. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-mitaka-midcycle > > > > I think we meant UEFI >= 2.4 there. Apparently in the UEFI version 2.4 > some feature was introduced that is required for the boot from volume > case. > > Hope that helps, > Lucas > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
