Are we still going to think of nfs-over-vsock? Never mind. It's just coming from my curiosity.
Cheers, S On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Valeriy Ponomaryov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks - so if I understand you correctly, each share instance is >> uniquely associated with a single instance of the driver at one time, >> right? So while I might have two concurrent calls to ensure_share, >> they are guaranteed to be for different shares? > > Yes. > >> Is this true for the whole driver interface? > > Yes. > >> >> Two instances of the >> driver will never both be asked to do operations on the same share at >> the same time? > > > Yes. > > Each instance of a driver will have its own unique list of shares to be > 'ensure'd. > > -- > Kind Regards > Valeriy Ponomaryov > www.mirantis.com > [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Email: [email protected] GitHub: shinobu-x Blog: Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
