On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:24:00AM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library > > > Team, > > > > fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2 > > > > We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are > > using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up? > > Is it really worth our time to dedicate extra resources to that? Glance has > been discussing (but it's been a low priority) to switing all our dependence > on httplib2 to requests (and maybe urllib3 directly) as necessary. > > We have other tools and libraries we can use without taking over maintenance > of yet another library. > > I think the better question than "Can people please maintain this for the > community?" is "What benefits does httplib2 have over something that is > actively maintained (and has been actively maintaiend) like urllib3, > requests, etc.?" > > And then we can (and should) also ask "Why have we been using this? How much > work do cores think it would be to remove this from our global requirements?"
+1. We just removed the last bits of it from ironicclient. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292498 // jim __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
