On 16 March 2016 at 09:15, Tim Bell <[email protected]> wrote: Then, there were major reservations from the PTLs at the impacts in terms of > latency, ability to reconcile and loss of control (transactions are > difficult, transactions > across services more so). > > Not just PTLs :-)
> <snip> > I would favor a library, at least initially. If we cannot agree on a > library, it > is unlikely that we can get a service adopted (even if it is desirable). > > A library (along the lines of 1 or 2 above) would allow consistent > implementation > of nested quotas and user quotas. Nested quotas is currently only > implemented > in Cinder and user quota implementations vary between projects which is > confusing. It is worth noting that the cinder implementation has been found rather lacking in correctness, atomicity requirements and testing - I wouldn't suggest taking it as anything other than a PoC to be honest. Certainly it should not be cargo-culted into another project in its present state. -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
