Thanks! Much appreciated. Will check
From: Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub<mailto:ke...@benton.pub>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 1:09 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] RBAC: Fix port query and deletion for network owner After reviewing your logs[1], it seems that quotas are not working correctly in your plugin. There are no statements about tenants being marked dirty, etc. I think you are missing the quota registry setup code in your plugin init. Here is the ML2 example: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/44ef44c0ff97d5b166d48d2ef93feafa9a0f7ea6/neutron/plugins/ml2/plugin.py#L167-L173<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openstack_neutron_blob_44ef44c0ff97d5b166d48d2ef93feafa9a0f7ea6_neutron_plugins_ml2_plugin.py-23L167-2DL173&d=BQMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=0W0JwODAYJdy_tB4tQT0nd1zhv2OJ35zOHr5UM4KUSs&s=lXC43_6eXjZnhUzC2nnFkaD--k9FnCn8_IQK2_tFtcs&e=> http://208.91.1.172/logs/neutron/293483/1/check-tempest-vmware-nsx-v3/q-svc.log.txt.gz<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__208.91.1.172_logs_neutron_293483_1_check-2Dtempest-2Dvmware-2Dnsx-2Dv3_q-2Dsvc.log.txt.gz&d=BQMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=0W0JwODAYJdy_tB4tQT0nd1zhv2OJ35zOHr5UM4KUSs&s=yxUgpc6J-xovf-ZwLu-wFeU6dGj4Ne6P-vTR32UCjrI&e=> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com<mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, The review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255285/ breaks our CI. Since this has landed we are getting failed tests with the: "Details: {u'message': u"Quota exceeded for resources: ['port'].", u'type': u'OverQuota', u'detail': uāā}" When I revert the patch and run our CI without it the tests pass. Is anyone else hitting the same or a similar issue? I think that for Mitaka we need to revert this patch Thanks Gary __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev