Technical Committee, Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment [1]. If people don't like the type name, we can change it. The basic idea is there are a class of projects unrepresented by type:service and type:library which are deployment projects including but not limited to Fuel, Kolla, OSA, and TripleO. The main motivation behind this addition are:
1. Make it known to all which projects are deployment projects in the governance repository. 2. Provide that information via the governance website under release management tags. 3. Permit deployment projects to take part in the assert tags relating to upgrades [2]. Currently fuel is listed as a type:service in the governance repository which is only partially accurate. It may provide a ReST API, but during the Kolla big tent application process, we were told we couldn't use type:service as it only applied to daemon services and not deployment projects. Regards -steve [1] https://review.openstack.org/295528 [2] https://review.openstack.org/295529
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
