On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:52:10PM +0000, Amrith Kumar wrote: > The meeting bot died during the meeting and therefore the logs on eavesdrop > are useless. So I've had to get "Old-Fashioned-Logs(tm)". > > Action Items: > > <amrith> #action [all] If you have a patch set that you intend to resume work > on, please put an update in it to that effect so we don't go abandon it under > you ... > <amrith> #action [all] if any of the abandoned patches looks like something > you would like to pick up feel free > <cp16net> #action cp16net reply to trove-dashboard ML question for RC2 > <amrith> #action [all] please review changes [3], [4], and link [5] in agenda > and update the reviews > > Agreed: > > <cp16net> #agreed flaper87 to WF+1 the patches in question [3] and [4] > > Meeting agenda is at > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Trove/MeetingAgendaHistory#Trove_Meeting.2C_March_23.2C_2016 > > Meeting minutes (complete transcript) is posted at > > https://gist.github.com/amrith/5ce3e4a0311f2cc4044c
I'm still unsure of the value of adding these tests, and would love some
pointers.
The current stable/liberty branch of trove fails
gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql with a summary of "FAILED (SKIP=23,
errors=13)"[1].
The 2 reviews in question fail with
"FAILED (SKIP=5, errors=2)"[2] and
"FAILED (SKIP=18, errors=1)"[3].
Granted these are heading in the right direction (in terms of fails). There is
no dependencies between the 2 reviews so I'll assume that if they're both
merged that number wont regress.
If you look at the logs all 3 runs failed "instance_resize_flavor"
[4][5][6]
So even with the changes merged you still don't end up with a gate job (even on
the experimental queue that you can "just use".
Yes you have improved testing coverage, but is it meaningful?
I'm not blocking you from merging them I just don't understand the benefit.
Tony.
[1]
http://logs.openstack.org/55/295055/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/f8d62a3/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-21_01_57_16_012
[2]
http://logs.openstack.org/89/262289/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/1464974/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-19_07_33_32_392
[3]
http://logs.openstack.org/87/262287/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/ad5dbff/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-19_07_39_27_114
[4]
http://logs.openstack.org/55/295055/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/f8d62a3/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-21_01_57_15_242
[5]
http://logs.openstack.org/87/262287/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/ad5dbff/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-19_07_39_26_000
[6]
http://logs.openstack.org/89/262289/1/experimental/gate-trove-scenario-functional-dsvm-mysql/1464974/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz#_2016-03-19_07_33_31_744
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
