On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Dan Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
[...] > That said regardless of what we eventually do with Pacemaker or Puppet > it should be feasible for them both to co-exist. The key thing to keep in mind if you're using Puppet to build a cluster is that if you're doing something to a service that is or will be managed by the cluster, that service should either: - not be part of the cluster at that time, or - the cluster needs to be told to ignore the service temporarily, or - the act of taking the service down or bringing it up needs to be done via cluster tools NOT doing one of those, telling the cluster "here's a service, make sure its available" and then screwing around with it, puts the cluster and Puppet into conflict (essentially an internal split-brain) that rarely ends well. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
