On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-04-09 06:42:54 -0700: > > There is also disincentive in +1ing a change that you don't understand > > and is wrong and then a core comes along and -1s it (you get dinged for > > the disagreement). And there is disincentive in -1ing a change for the > > wrong reasons (silly nits or asking questions for understanding). I ask > > a lot of questions in a lot of changes and I don't vote on those because > > it would be inappropriate. > > > > Why is disagreement a negative thing? IMO, reviewers who agree too much > are just part of the echo chamber. > > There is no problem with disagreement IMHO. However, we track it as a stat, and people don't want to feel as though they are in disagreement with the cores. I think this is just some level of psychology. I very, very rarely look at disagreement stat for anything (now or when I was PTL). --Morgan
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
