On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:01:39PM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 12/04/16 11:48, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-04-12 11:43:06 +1200 (+1200), Steve Baker wrote: > > Can I suggest a sub-team for > os-collect-config/os-refresh-config/os-apply-config? I ask since > these tools also make up the default heat agent, and there is > nothing in them which is TripleO specific. > > Could make sense similarly for diskimage-builder, as there is a lot > of TripleO/Infra cross-over use and contribution happening there. > > +1, this tool is general purpose and has diverse contributors and > consumers
This already exists: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/115,members https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/gerrit/acls/openstack/diskimage-builder.config It's already in use and a number of folks not (or no longer) active in tripleo-core have been added as they are involved with DiB. There is also already a sub-team for os-apply-config but it currently only contains tripleo-core: https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/gerrit/acls/openstack/os-apply-config.config https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/142,members For os-*-config I'm not sure we gain much as the contribution rate is pretty low - like there's maybe one or two outstanding patches right now accross all three projects. Thus it could be argued that there's little justification for actively managing a sub-team in that case. Steve __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev