Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their findings. You may find after reviewing the proposals, that eg only 2 are really different. Or they several have merit because they are addressing slightly different issues. That would make it easier to present/discuss/decide at the session.
--ruby On 12 April 2016 at 09:17, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02:44AM +0800, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > > Maybe we can continue the discussion here, as there's no enough time in > the > > irc meeting :) > > Someone mentioned this would make a good summit session, as there's a > few competing proposals that are all good options. I do welcome > discussion here until then, but I'm going to put it on the schedule. :) > > // jim > > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zgli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ironic is currently using shellinabox to provide a serial console, but > > > it's not compatible > > > with nova, so I would like to propose a new console type and a custom > HTTP > > > proxy [1] > > > which validate token and connect to ironic console from nova. > > > > > > On Horizon side, we should add support for the new console type [2] as > > > well, here are some screenshots from my local environment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Additionally, shellinabox console ports management should be improved > in > > > ironic, instead of manually specified, we should introduce dynamically > > > allocation/deallocation [3] mechanism. > > > > > > Functionality is being implemented in Nova, Horizon and Ironic: > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/shellinabox-http-proxy > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/ironic-shellinabox-console > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bug/1526371 > > > > > > > > > PS: to achieve this goal, we can also add a new console driver in > ironic > > > [4], but I think it doesn't conflict with this, as shellinabox is > capable > > > to integrate with nova, and we should support all console drivers. > > > > > > > > > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shellinabox-http-proxy > > > [2] > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ironic-shellinabox-console > > > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1526371 > > > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1553083 > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Zhenguo Niu > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Zhenguo Niu > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
