On 12/04/2016 18:39, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-04-01 15:50:57 +0000 (+0000), Hayes, Graham wrote: >> If a team has already done a TA (e.g. as part of an internal >> product TA) (and produced all the documentation) would this meet >> the requirements? >> >> I ask, as Designate looks like it meets nearly all the current >> requirements - the only outstanding question in my mind was the >> Threat Analysis > > Seems fine to me, though in the interest of openness that > documentation should probably be licensed such that it can be > published somewhere for the whole community to read (once any > glaring deficiencies are addressed anyway). >
Definitely - I have a request in to open the analysis for public distribution. My feeling is that it should land somewhere in our docs, and be covered by the same license as them. (I *think* that is MIT for us) - Graham __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
