On 4/29/2016 10:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's
probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca.
By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1
(1.2.8). Additionally Debian Jessie has 1.2.9. RHEL 7.2 is at 1.2.17.
By the time Ocata is released, I think it'll be valid to ignore
RHEL-7.1, as we'll already be onto 7.3 at that time.
My suggestion is we set MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.8. This will mean
that NUMA support in libvirt (excepting the blacklists) and huge page
support is assumed on x86_64.
If we ignore RHEL 7.1, we could go to 1.2.9 which is the min in Jessie.
Is there a simple reason why ignoring RHEL 7.1 is OK? Honestly I can't
remember which OpenStack release came out around that time, was it Kilo?
We should also now consider our minimum QEMU versions. Jessie will have
QEMU 2.1.0, 16.04 LTS will have 2.5.0 and RHEL 7.2 will have 2.3.0
So that'd suggest a valid QEMU/KVM version of 2.1.0, vs our current
1.5.3 version.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
