On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > Fellow Core Reviewers, > > Since many of the engineers working on the kolla-mesos repository are moving > on to other things[1], possibly including implementing Kubernetes as an > underlay for OpenStack containers, I propose we move the kolla-mesos > repository into the attic[2]. This will allow folks to focus on Ryan's > effort[3] to use Kubernetes as an underlay for Kolla containers for folks > that want a software based underlay rather than bare metal. I understand > Mirantis's position that Kubernetes may have some perceived "more mojo" and > If we are to work on an underlay, it might as well be a fresh effort based > upon the experience of the past two failures to develop a software underlay > for OpenStack services. We can come back to mesos once kubernetes is > implemented with a fresh perspective on the problem. > > Please vote +1 to attic the repo, or –1 not to attic the repo. I'll leave > the voting open until everyone has voted, or for 1 week until April 29th, > 2016. > > Regards > -steve > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-April/093143.html > [2] https://github.com/openstack-attic > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304182/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
I am +1 on this. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev