On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Fellow Core Reviewers,
>
> Since many of the engineers working on the kolla-mesos repository are moving
> on to other things[1], possibly including implementing Kubernetes as an
> underlay for OpenStack containers, I propose we move the kolla-mesos
> repository into the attic[2].  This will allow folks to focus on Ryan's
> effort[3] to use Kubernetes as an underlay for Kolla containers for folks
> that want a software based underlay rather than bare metal.  I understand
> Mirantis's position that Kubernetes may have some perceived "more mojo" and
> If we are to work on an underlay, it might as well be a fresh effort based
> upon the experience of the past two failures to develop a software underlay
> for OpenStack services.  We can come back to mesos once kubernetes is
> implemented with a fresh perspective on the problem.
>
> Please vote +1 to attic the repo, or –1 not to attic the repo.  I'll leave
> the voting open until everyone has voted, or for 1 week until April 29th,
> 2016.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-April/093143.html
> [2] https://github.com/openstack-attic
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304182/
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>


I am +1 on this.

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to