On 05/03/2016 09:11 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > Very sad to know that some projects are missing again in the "others" > category. When I want to cite some statistic data for Tricircle core reviewer > nomination, can't find the data for many "others" projects which usually are > listed "others" category. Is there any new rule in Stackalytics? > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
I use gerrit directly for evaluation of reviewing activity. Gerrit has many different queries that can be created to evaluate individual contributions both for ownership of patches and for reviewing patches. Besides, while absolute numbers of patches can be useful, evaluating the quality of the individual's review is vastly more important. Taking the time to make useful inline comments and link to references to support contributor's composing really good patches far surpasses numbers in my book. Many of my best reviews on patches don't include a vote, something that stackalytics doesn't count at all. There is a whole world of valuable data on gerrit. I encourage you to explore it: https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/user-search.html Thank you, Anita. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
